What would create Bluetooth easier to use?

Bluetooth are loyal Fans, come in Techie world. But ... that doesn't mean there aren't some improvements that could make things better.

For example ... ...

Why is it that Bluetooth mice and other pointing devices usually require A USB adapter, even if they are sold today many laptops with native Bluetooth? it seems very difficult to get to work with native Bluetooth mouse. Is it really isn't that much fun to try to connect/disconnect dongle or avoid bumping it yourself when setting up your presentation.

In a broader scale, it appears that an easy way to connect and use the Bluetooth was excellent. Is it really a standard, or have some distance to go?

I think that many usability via Bluetooth with distress sympathize.Many first generation Bluetooth devices used way too much and were always on battery power. The later products of certain vendors obviously abandon standards like Logitech, who uses a proprietary connection Bluetooth headphones or some other vendors that do not have or do not use the same standards support, such as stereo headphones and standard mouse With a2dp. as you have mentioned some of the same type of problems.

In addition to these problems connection disconnect buttons on most Bluetooth seem tiny and difficult to use. As regards specifically go mouse Logitech puts some non Bluetooth wireless mouse that uses so little that they aren't endangering precariously placed receivers and well-being for your notebook/receiver And Let's not forget ... the easiest option to connect wired mouse-mouse, where always know when it is connected and when the Sun and you never have to worry about batteries.

Overall, "the problem", due to vendor device (notebook, mice, headsets, phone, etc.) including all providers of software (ie drivers) is not in the Bluetooth software on your device. So for instance a headset with the phone works fine, but would not match with hp PDA, yet the hp PDA pair with your portable computer for Internet access.

Second attempt to explain this user is too technical, and in fact should not be required, ie should meet the expectation installations user usage and software support built in, but For a vendor. This means adding more costs in terms of additional software.

So My view is to make all devices are all expected software and support is available or secure packaging/manual is clear on what device-CSR, which supplies 80% of Bluetooth chips could help to more market orientated and ensure that the message gets through outside vendors and end users.We would favour and CSR.

Another issue ...Bluetooth Support on Windows was extremely poor and now only limited profile support.This Has meant that suppliers have to supply the devices with the Bluetooth stack and, due to licensing issues, which also means that it should provide a Bluetooth dongle.

Get lucky and get the laptop with the same stack as a vendor-supplied Bluetooth peripheral, but his pot luck, if you don't know what to look for Common stacks are Toshiba., Widcomm and Blue Soleil, but all require licensing built into Bluetooth Dongle for full functionality.Vista has improved Bluetooth support, so you can start to alleviate the problem.

The most often heard, is My brother, batteries and his wife got Bluetooth headphones for each of their cellphones. Didn't take long to realize that battery life was miserable to point useless .... and the process of detection and the connection is real pain in the ear.

So close ... likely top design with the best chances to make most people happy is better battery, Bluetooth, auto-discovery, and mounts.

If you would like to add more issues ... or suggestions ... by all means leave a comment.

Michael owns communication FreedomFire .... including DS3-bandwidth.com. Michael also authors Broadband nation where you are always welcome to drop in and capture a broadband news, tips, thoughts and ramblings for masses.